Return to normalcy or eye of the hurricane?

I think we are living in confusing times.  While the pandemic has been "scheduled" by Biden to end in early May of this year, many mandates have been rolled back, there is growing reluctance in the population to accept vaccine boosters or government recommendations regarding health measures, and lawsuits are causing significant setbacks to the globalists' agenda, we are faced with continued planning by the globalists to implement the Great Reset and further their totalitarian agenda, masquerading as benign messengers of health safety and sustainable development goals. While on the one hand, there are signs that the crisis is winding down, there are others suggesting that COVID-19 was just the warm-up for the main event, or that at least we are in the eye of the hurricane.

The W.H.O. has temporarily backed off on some of the amendments to its International Health Regulations, at least according to James Roguski, who has been following their activities closely, but they have not abandoned their ambition to use pandemic management as a mechanism for tricking the countries of the world into accepting the sole authority and dominion of the W.H.O. in pandemic management policy.  The recent "Catastrophic Contagion" exercise, analogous to  Event 201 in 2-19, is a likely harbinger of what is being planned.  This of course, would just be the foot in the door to more radical economic and social restructuring, routinizing all the measures used in the early phases of the pandemic and probably others to restrict the freedoms of the world's population (except for the elites of course). Additionally, the activities of Blackrock, divesting its holdings of all companies not following SDG guidelines indicates the seriousness of the moneyed powers about achieving their goals of omnipotence.  The looming threats of climate lockdowns, geofencing, increased surveillance, CBDC currencies, and digital ID's still remains alive and well.  We still face a largely numb and passive population, especially amongst those in political power, who seem more given to blindly following party leadership than to exercising independent judgment. In addition to the prospect for the oft-promised series of recurrent pandemics, we are faced with crises in our food production and supply, energy supply,  a crisis in confidence in our political system, with an ongoing financial squeeze due to the massive amount of debt created by the Federal Reserve Bank, with a sickened and disabled population, a new generation fed on the lies and obfuscations of woke culture,  and the possibilities of kinetic war with either Russia, China or both.

As RFK Jr. has said, no-one ever complied their way out of totalitarianism.  So the need for continued resistance is still very strong. It seems to me it is timely to be ever more thoughtful about our strategy as we continue to try to stave off disaster.   Most resistance movements have historically been undercut by an underdeveloped vision of what kind of new and better systems will replace the old systems which are being resisted.  It is easier to fight against what you disapprove of than to create something better which will not only successfully address the weaknesses and failures of the old system, but institute new systems capable of enduring in perpetuity. The Founding Fathers' achievement is notable in this regard, but clearly their "new and improved" system contained imperfections, which we are now faced with the task of fixing.

So part of the process, I believe, will be envisioning better systems for the future, in health care, government, economics, education, and  technology and communications systems, which bear the stamp of the values of freedom, integrity and respect for others our country was founded on, not the elitist and anti-humanist values of the globalists. The second part will be creating a better strategy of resistance.

Regarding this latter strategy, I believe it will be important to target a select population, since most of the population not already siding with us have shown a certain degree of refractoriness (to put it kindly) to presentations of evidence that contradicts what government propaganda has persuaded them to be true.  There is a certain weariness of debate that has take hold of much of the population, who would rather not have the discussion at all rather than confront uncomfortably dissonant perspectives yet again.   Those in position of power can not so easily afford to fob off divergent viewpoints, much as they may want to and even succeed in censoring them or refuse to engage with those expressing them.  Ultimately they hold their power at the good graces of the electorate, and a small minority of them, mirabile dictu, actually care about doing a good job of serving those who put them into power.  Among those I think should be targeted for our own counterattacking information war should be state governors, lieutenant governors, attorney generals, state representatives and senators, county sheriffs, police chiefs, and possibly leaders of the National Guard.  Having all of these individuals in positions of local power line up with the Federal Government's authority is essential for the totalitarian agenda's success.  We already have examples of local resistance succeeding or knocking on the door of victory, most noticeably with the example of the state of Florida, but also to some degree in South Dakota and Texas.  Wyoming's legislature is currently reviewing a bill that would nullify the authority of the CDC and the WHO in the state. Numerous counties in Oregon, western Virginia, Western Colorado, New Mexico, and Illinois are considering seceding and joining other nearby states that have politics that are more in line with human rights and with what is written in the Constitution. All these examples are not meant as suggestions for copycat actions elsewhere but as examples of the possibility of successful action on the local level.

I think we need to blitz these officials with documents demanding an end to unconstitutional initiatives by government, and those that violate basic human rights. We need to gain audience with these individuals to voice our perspectives in person as articulately and forcefully as we can, but also with respect and  a clearly peaceful intent.  We need  to demonstrate that we are not going away. Like a dumb commercial, we need to stick in the minds of those in power we communicate with or meet with, if for no other reason than to churn the intellects of those whose mental processes have been stagnated by blind conformism, or by fear of the consequences of independent thought or action.

I would appreciate any feedback you have on these ideas, including suggestions for improvements or alternate viewpoints.  I think it is essential we pow-wow, even within the Substack forum, because the war is still raging and the other side is conferencing all the time.