Elephant in the Room Questions
Two very important questions that our side must elucidate somehow sometime:
When did those responsible for developing and releasing the COVID injections realize the severe toxicity that would result from these products — before the 2020 trials, during the trials, or only after the trials were over, or after they had been released to the public? In short, who knew what and when? It is still possible to argue (although I am increasingly skeptical of this) that the injections were intended to make money, not harm anyone, and that once the business decision was made to put all the money into "vaccine" development, the project was simply "too big to fail" — i.e., that too much financially was at stake to back away from the plan.
Did those with the responsibility for authorizing and recommending the mass vaccination program — particularly people such as Peter Marks, Robert Redfield, Rochelle Walensky, Tony Fauci, Frances Collins, Stephan Bancel, Albert Bourla, and Joseph Biden intend to harm or kill people with their mass vaccination program? Or did they just persist in it because too much money and their reputations were at stake, so they felt they couldn't blow the whistle on the program? While the pandemic directors would never admit to intending to kill or harm others, it may suffice to demonstrate intent to harm or kill to show that they were aware of the harms and lethal consequences of the injections and promoted them anyway. Although none of us appear to know of smoking guns, the evidence seems most consistent to me with intent to harm and kill by some or all of the protagonists, based on
The likelihood that the virus was developed and released as a bioweapon in Wuhan.
The fact that it was developed with American financial and scientific support
The history of numerous prior failed attempts by international public health officials at creating fake pandemics, suggesting malicious designs.
The plan, outlined at Event 201, to silence the mainstream media, clearly anticipating a severe negative reaction to the pandemic management program.
The efforts to use a technology on a population-wide basis that clinicians had only scant clinical experience with, all of it catastrophic.
The efforts to use "show" scientific trials rather than doing sound science.
The efforts to cover up or hide the harms done to patients in the vaccine trials.
The efforts to smear, libel and disempower anyone who said or implied anything harmful or detrimental about the infection program (they claimed this censorship was because the virus was so dangerous and killing people, but it became clear as early as March 2020, base on the Italian data and Ioannidis' research that the vaccine was scarcely more dangerous than the annual flu, and that this objection was entirely confabulated).
Dollar Bill Gates' previous vaccine programs contained beta-HCG, which were sterilizing women in India and Africa.
Dollar Bill Gates' previous DPT program in West Africa which was killing children.
Dollar Bill Gates' prior statement that if "we do a good job with vaccines" the world's population growth can be reduced by 10-15% (from TED talk).
The failure of politiicians, public health officials, and even responsible journalists in the mainstream to blow the whistle and stop the COVID injection program, after many responsible vaccinologists, epidemiologists, researchers and clinicians had publicly declared that the injections were causing more harm than good.
The objections of those calling for cessation of the COVID injection program were never seriously addressed with compelling and well-conducted alternative scientific studies demonstrating safety and efficacy, demonstrating that the proponents of the program knew their position was scientifically indefensible, but that they were going to go ahead with it anyway.
The lack of interest in the vaccine injured and the attempts to discredit the VAERS reports.
I'm sure there are others you can think of. There is significant other evidence that the pandemic was planned, which I'm sure you are familiar with, but the evidence that it was planned does not indicate that it was necessarily planned to be harmful.